I picked up a 50ct. box of one hundred sixty Nosler Accubonds, but I am hesitant to melt away the powder and projectiles on workup when all I have is fifty bullets. But I actually need to find a bullet from the one hundred sixty class that my older rifle likes.

H4831 will perform within the Swift although not actual nicely. You'll hardly ever obtain the pressures you'll need for consistency Using the .223. 760, or H414 are going to be greater but for some motive I ain't the greatest supporter of most ball powders.

This is amongst the greatest causes reloaders are admonished to make use of new data only; and to get started on very low each and every time you receive a completely new wide range of powder. You do not truly know (Except the corporate tells you so) that the new large amount of powder was even designed at the identical manufacturing facility given that the powder you acquire a number of years in the past.

With all the 154 grain Hornady SP from the 280, H4831 gave me good groups and great velocity, but Rottweil R905 contains a considerably greater velocity and delivers marginally far better accuracy. With Swift a hundred and fifty grain Sciroccos while in the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave excellent accuracy and velocity, but RL22 was marginally much better. For that reason, in Each individual of those scenarios I went with One more powder, but I will surely despise to divest myself in the H4831.

The only real distinction as I realize it would be that the SC was designed to perform as a result of powder steps superior (which it does). The extended grains will not feed very well in the least in a few measures. Thats my 02 :grin:

Apache Jct Excellent info, I have jars of equally and always questioned if they could be reloaded Together with the exact same recipes really should I run out of 1 or one other.

I don't love to work up a load employing a person great deal of powder after which you can have to work up yet again mainly because I run out and possess to begin using a new lot selection.

While this is probably real, there is a great deal far more to it than simply not blowing you up. He could not strike prairie pet dogs past about 150 yards, so I'm guessing that inconsistent combustion wasn't carrying out everything favorable for his grouping skill with Those people loads.

dioni.a.312 mentioned: In my practical experience the only true difference is that the shortcut meters superior via reloading products. Once It truly is loaded theres no practical variance. I have heard that the shortcut could have a very small little bit quicker burn off h4831sc load data amount but It appears insignificant. Click to increase...

It really is humorous how over time loading countless distinct cartridges in numerous rifles which i haven't gained acceptable stop effects with H-4831 or even the limited-Slice Variation.

Validate YOUR AGE Specific states prohibit advertising or internet marketing of firearms, ammunition, and similar firearm parts to minors. We’d like to make sure that you’re eighteen many years of age or more mature prior to allowing for you to shop our web page. Do you think you're eighteen several years of age or more mature?

Like All people mentioned, the SC means “limited Reduce” and is particularly a bit easier to meter. Would make you dilemma why they would even now make the frequent a single.

Though IMR 4831 and H4831SC h4831sc are diverse powders, you'll find that in many cases, where one of them is mentioned the other might be also. Also, you will find there is a reasonably consistent romantic relationship concerning them in regards to shown loads.

If I've a pound or two of the powder and purchase extra of the same, only a special good deal variety, I will combine them h4831 vs h4831sc all up in order that I have a homogeneous batch of powder with which to work.